English version July
2020

Revealed, out of now day's
knowledge & available technological means, that most of the universe is composed
out of unreachable deep blank volume. Consequence, one can, easily, describe the space as, mostly, complex out of almost
blank multi-dimensional space points (black dots, Fig #2), each
taking up tiny, up to
dimensions in the nil, volume.

Assume that any such point is, all direction, surrounded
by most similar points and consider quantum theory, which, inter alia, means:

• Mass, even aspires zero, has its typical: self-frequency & wavelength.

• Smaller
the mass (quantum dimension), longer its self-frequency wavelength.

• Larger the
mass, shorter its self-frequency wavelength, unobservable above quantum sizes (Classic meaning).

Assume almost completely blank points,
aims for zero mass, combined quantum theory reference (second mark), obtain huge,
and actually strives to infinite, wavelength characteristic point. This wavelength, coming
out off the point, all possible: directions & dimensions can be imagined (Fig #1)
as pushing the space away, in a way of
creating rejection outwards
the point (defined: **"point space distortion creation"**).

• Mass, even aspires zero, has its typical: self-frequency & wavelength.

Fig # 1: an almost completely empty point, black
circle, pushing the the space, all
directions away, red arrows

It is time to suggest mathematical
transformation conclusion vectors, inclusion of "**Lorentz transformation**"**,**
in a way the velocity summarized "**Lorentz
transformation**"**,** is an
individual case. With the transformation suggested, summarizing each vector
warping space, create all points around, must be, in all directions &
dimensions possible, by the most intensity, the warp space strength creates a
single point, equals this power when dealing with countless points. Example of
generalized** "Lorenz
transformation"**: Suppose one moves at the speed of light on a train
that moves at the speed of light that, in turn, moves on a train that moves at
the speed of light and so on, n Such trains (n aspires infinite).
Outcome of ** "Lorentz
transformation" **generalization and the fact that the speed of light is
the maximum nature possible speed (Private Relativity Theory), that our
speed,
relative to earth surface (n trains), is no more, but much closer, to the speed of light itself.

Fig # 2:
countless almost completely empty points and their impact on space (Two
examples: top right and enlarged one at the center)

Using the transformation suggested
to sum vectors created both: all points around, and space point self
distortion, as long as the point mass aims for zero and assuming an homogeneous
dispersion of Infinite points number at the surrounding space, get the vectors
to balance each other (zero sum), means that the net opposite effect on
consideration point is offset - "**loose
equilibrium**". Investigate the summary of both vectors: space &
self, created by tested point, in case the point mass is growing above quantum
sizes (Fig
#3), Get the wavelength of the point self frequency is "**reduced". **Thus, after describing
the wavelength as pushing the space away, the intensity of its space curve is
decreased (Fig #3, blue arrows). Accepted that the summary vector space
all points warping create around (red), which, on the mass
point, remains unchanged, is greater than the **"reduced**"** **space
warp mass self produced, in a way that the net total summary vectors warping
space is into the mass, means the mass is "**held**"** **by space at "**steady equilibrium**", much like the
mass classic definition -** "body
resistance to state changes".**

which is exceeds the reduced space distortion creates the mass itself, blue arrows.

Hence, we see that, at nonzero mass,
the quantum theory itself predict a space warping toward the mass, exactly as
general relativity theory prediction to explains gravity existence.

Further to the connection between quantum theory & gravity discussion; is the time to deal with another aspect of self-frequency quantum sizes bodies. It is known that, having a body mass, one can easily calculate its both: self frequency & characterized wavelength, which, as mentioned earlier, as far as we consider quantum sizes, is larger.

Fig: # 4:
Description an average wave function over long time, red arrows, Which partly
outside partly inside the black hole border, marked black.

Watcher, located outside, measures only the amount of matter proportional to the wave function part which is, in time average, out of the black hole, at the example 90%, while the mass he measure is the same mass as a inside viewer measure. This 90 percent disperse outside the black hole space, all directions equally at no preferred one, so that, in each space point it has a very much minor impact.

Investigating the term "

Fig #5: Harmonic oscillation of the examined point, its center at left, Around equilibrium one dimension point, right small point.

At a random time, a wave function oscillation of **(x)** elemetary unit length measured at
either right or left side from equilibrium (into or out of the mass unit, Fig #5,
red bottom arrows). Being the equilibrium point a stable equilibrium,
statistically, at coming measures, the wave function vibration strive to return (Fig #5, red
arrows top) .Since, according to relativity theory, "**speed of light**"** **(Marked
C) is the maximum speed possible, hence the time return to equilibrium, from
the wave moving, at almost the speed of light, point of view, is
,approximately, t (time units ) = X (Single length units )/C ( km/sec )
**(t **defined: "**Basic Time Unit**"**)**.

These return time & oscillation amplitude, as an out off the wave function not moving watcher measure, as the relativity theory predicts are much longer - the time he measure (twin paradox) could be at about 14 billion year (approximate known universe age) when the oscillation amplitude he measure can be about the same magnitude as the known universe dimensions.

Does this mean that when dealing
with quantum beings, such as electromagnetic radiation, distance & time are
roughly the same variables - multiplication/difference by only a constant (speed
of light "c")?

In my opinion - since time defined
as a scalar, which, at least on average over many time units, proceed at one
direction only, while distance (position), being a vector, can proceed at
varied directions - the answer is negative

Obviously, when treat time as a
vector size, like most other sizes, with power and direction, we get the option
of "**parallel universes"**. Using these universes, it can be, theoretically possible, to pass backward
& forward in time.

These return time & oscillation amplitude, as an out off the wave function not moving watcher measure, as the relativity theory predicts are much longer - the time he measure (twin paradox) could be at about 14 billion year (approximate known universe age) when the oscillation amplitude he measure can be about the same magnitude as the known universe dimensions.

It is clearly visible that the
theory showed, generality with three known space dimension, has more likely
corresponds (with slightly movements around the steady state) to the universe structure theory known the **"steady state theory",** less to the one known the **"Big Bang theory**", which is
more prevalent today. Thus, since today the universe is seen as expanding, its
current situation according our theory, found in one of the two following
options: expanding either from the interior imaginary three-dimensional ball
formed by summing up the three dimensional equilibrium points, back towards the
surface of the three-dimensional equilibrium ball
((defined: **"steady equilibrium ball
surface**" or "**ball surface**")
Fig #5
lefttop red arrow) or, alternatively, out
from steady equilibrium ball (Fig #5, lower right red arrow).

Perhaps, now it is appropriate to add that when the mass of
the universe is indeed negligible, as assumed, then oscillation around the
equilibrium ball could, on one hand, expanded up to almost infinite, or, on the
other hand, shrink almost into zero dimensions - the **"Big Bang" **beginning dimensions.** **So we get the **"Big
Bang"**, at least about the universe origin question at one singular point,
to be a private case of the **"steady
state"**, as described.

As we demonstrate so far, any: emptiness, particle, unit masse or the universe itself, at any given time, is at oscillation around equilibrium ball surface. The possible oscillations modes are:

•
"**Expansion**"** **as
describe in the previous chapter.

• "**Minimizing**"** **from outside back towards the steady equilibrium ball surface (Fig #5, upper right red arrow) or from the ball surface back into three dimensional imaginary ball, created by summing up the three dimensional space equilibrium points (Fig #5, lower left red arrow).

So it is accepting that:

• In the case of**
"reduction**"** **(Fig #6)_{ },the
reduction vector summary space create (black center arrow), is slightly offset by
space warp vector, generates the point self-frequency itself (below in
blue), in a way that summing up with the space warp
vector, creating dots around (red above), gives a total vector inside
(defined: "**gravity/material**").

Fig #6: Reduction, demonstration at one dimension.

•
In the case of "**expansion"** (Fig #7), the
summary vector space, expansion create (black arrow), is
adding to the vector space warping creates by self-point frequency (Blue arrow)
hence summarizing up with the vector space warping, create points around (red arrow),
getting ,as soon as dealing with quantum order mass, that the total warp vector
is outward the equilibrium ball surface (defined :"**rejection/anti-matter**").

Fig #7: Expansion, demonstration at one dimension

• In the case of mass at above quantum size **"expansion"**, (Fig #7), the fact that the space vector
distortion created by self frequency (blue arrow) is negligible, as stated in the
first chapter, we might get the vector space warping, points around the mass
create (red arrow), to overcome the sum of the space warp
vectors, create the expansion (black arrow) and the self frequency
vector. Consequently, summary all vector space warping might estate a net
vector warping of space inside - "**matter".**

Hence, the rarity relative observation of "**anti matter**"
is occurred, mainly in case of quantum scale expansion.

Conjunction with the first chapter
work assumption, that most of the universe consists of almost completely empty
points; it is accept that almost half of the universe is complex out of
anti-material.

Hence, the rarity relative observation of "

So far, chapter five, we show that, as harmonic oscillations around a "

The answer to this question seems to
be very simple. As a harmonic oscillation drives out of a released nervous
spring, has the highest speed on the center (only kinetic energy) and the
lowest on both ends (zero for a very short time). In such a way, at our
multidimensional ball, one can imagine the oscillation speed around a **"stable equilibrium ball**", as zero, at the edges, for a very
short time, maximum, almost infinite, at the center (equilibrium ball surface).

Hence, we get that the speed of light, which at a given time, assume to be the maximum possible speed in nature, must be equal to a oscillation moment velocity of the almost empty point/universe/black hole, and can vary ,over time, from zero (at edges) to almost infinity (at equilibrium point/ball).

The question to be asked is whether measuring the changes within the speed of light over many years, say today and a billion years ago, can help to conclude the today state of the universe (present accurately expansion location) and thus to deduce: the mass of the universe, the amount of meters, global gravity constant "G" ,characteristic energy level of the void and many other constants & variables ?

Hence, we get that the speed of light, which at a given time, assume to be the maximum possible speed in nature, must be equal to a oscillation moment velocity of the almost empty point/universe/black hole, and can vary ,over time, from zero (at edges) to almost infinity (at equilibrium point/ball).

The question to be asked is whether measuring the changes within the speed of light over many years, say today and a billion years ago, can help to conclude the today state of the universe (present accurately expansion location) and thus to deduce: the mass of the universe, the amount of meters, global gravity constant "G" ,characteristic energy level of the void and many other constants & variables ?

As long as assumed perfect multi-dimensional ball structure, and now any priority axis, it was possible to use, the calculus math, result of the exampled one dimension universe to higher dimensions. As changing the assumption slightly, the multi-ball is no longer perfect (yet much similar for a perfect multi-

At the article first chapter, we talked about multiple almost complete blank points. Later, chapters' #2 - #7, we built the possibility that each such point could be considered as a complete, on its own, universe. So assume that the universe known today is almost complete blank point, one among many others, that make up a greater, by number orders of magnitude, universe, than our (defined

At the article first part, mentioned which revile out off the quantum theory, as smaller the mass as more significant the quantum phenomena are. If so ,when live in smaller, by 40 magnitude orders from our universe, one might conclude that quantum phenomena are more meaningful, conclusion which, at least prima facie, contradicts to the physics principle invariance law, as in the previous section claimed to exist, regardless of the universe relative size.

In this, last before final chapter, under the assumption that determines the speed of light is the maximum possible speed in nature, equal the accurate time oscillation speed (Chapter 7), we shall propose a mind experiment to investigate their changes, since the universe beginning to present, all under determination (Episode 5) that we live in a expanded universe, which has two nature options: expansion out from equilibrium ball surface or widened from inside toward the equilibrium ball.

Consistent with the second option, which seems to be more in line with our current universe state ,the universe is expanding from interior toward the equilibrium ball. Then according chapter #6, combined the assumption that its mass is at quantum sizes, our universe self behave outward as antimatter/antiparticle. As mentioned, this case, the speed of light/oscillation at "birth of the universe" was slower ,aiming for zero ,and increasing along time .So a body, today measured at 9 billion light years away is actually closer. Therefore, its real energy is much lower, bay the ratio of the square of the distance differences, than we think.

At previous chapters, we talked about measuring: distances, speeds, locations, etc. An implicit assumption, for those measurements, is that there is a set of three, four or more dimensions space that can be defined.

At the first chapter, we raised the article main novelty, showed that the quantum theory has no conflict with the theory of relativity & gravity - force of it, as is commonly thought, but even, combined the almost blank multi-dimensional space points definition, contradict that the distortion of space itself lead to gravity, in a way similar to the prediction that emerges from general relativity.

Further, we showed that the quantum theory explains other phenomena, such as: dark matter/energy, at the second chapter, matter/anti-matter at the sixth and possible many other phenomena.

Is there any possibility that at the future, dimensionless